cross-sectional study of attitude towards psychiatry among undergraduate medical students

Shiva Kumar BK1, Neeraj Raj B2, Vinay HR3

1Department of Psychiatry, Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, Adichunchanagiri University, BG nagara, Nagamangala taluk, Mandya district, Karnataka, India, 2Department of Psychiatry, Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, Adichunchanagiri University, BG nagara, Nagamangala taluk, Mandya district, Karnataka, India, 3Department of Psychiatry, Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, Adichunchanagiri University, BG nagara, Nagamangala taluk, Mandya district, Karnataka, India


Background: Psychiatric disorders are common, affecting millions of population worldwide. Patients with psychiatric disorders, psychiatrists as professionals, and psychiatry as a subject are seen in negative attitudes. Prejudices and negative attitudes exist among medical professionals as well. Aims: This study aims to know the attitude of undergraduate medical students towards psychiatry and compare the attitude among students with or without exposure to clinical psychiatry postings. Materials and methods: This is a descriptive, cross-sectional study conducted at a medical college, Karnataka, South India. Undergraduate students belonging to all phases and consenting for the study were the participants. They were considered into two groups, students not exposed to psychiatry clinical posting and students exposed to psychiatry clinical postings, respectively. Apart from collecting sociodemographic details, a self-administered Attitude Towards Psychiatry‑30 items questionnaire was used and t-test, chi-square/Fisher’s exact test were used for statistical analyses. Result: The sample consisted of 484 students, of which 52.3% vs 47.7% of students were not exposed to psychiatry vs exposed to psychiatry clinical postings respectively. Overall students reported having a positive attitude towards psychiatry. We found 96.1% of students with clinical exposure to psychiatry have a better attitude compared to 86.9% of students not exposed to psychiatry clinical postings. Conclusion: A positive attitude towards psychiatry is necessary for better care of patients as well as to reduce stigma regarding mental illness. As clinical exposure improves the positive attitude, there is always a scope for improvements in the form of better psychiatry training at the undergraduate level.

Keywords: Medical Undergraduates. Psychiatrist. Psychiatric Hospital. Psychiatric Illness.

Correspondence: Dr. Shiva Kumar BK, MD, DPM, Associate Professor, Department of Psychiatry, Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, Adichunchanagiri University, BG nagara-571448, Nagamangala taluk, Mandya district, Karnataka, India. drshivbk@gmail.com

Received: 5 August 2019

Revised: 19 September 2020

Accepted: 22 September 2020

Epub: 26 September 2020

DOI: 10.5958/2394-2061.2021.00015.X


People with mental illness are among the most stigmatised, marginalised, and vulnerable members of society, and suffer from discrimination in many areas of daily life as a consequence of their illness.[1] Medical students often have stigmatised views towards mental illness before the commencement of their medical training.[2,3] Medical undergraduate training renders a chance to teach and promote psychiatry to students, and inculcate interest to choose psychiatry as a career specialty. However, while they have a positive effect on students’ attitude towards psychiatry, there is mixed evidence of their impact on psychiatry as a career choice.[4] To investigate the influence of psychiatry clinical posting on attitude towards psychiatry among undergraduate medical students, and apparent disparity between positive attitude towards psychiatry as a discipline and negative attitude towards psychiatry as a career, a survey of undergraduate medical students was undertaken at a medical college.


This is a descriptive, cross-sectional study conducted at Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Center, a constituent college of Adichunchanagiri University, a tertiary care hospital in Karnataka, South India. The sample comprised of medical undergraduate students from all four professional phases of Bachelor of Medicine, Bachelor of Surgery (MBBS) who are currently studying in the institute. They were recruited using purposive sampling. The study was conducted for three months from January to March 2019. Clearance from the Institute’s Ethics Committee was obtained before starting the study. Informed consent was taken from all students. Then, specially constructed semi-structured proforma and a standardised self-answering questionnaire called Attitude Towards Psychiatry-30 items (ATP-30)[5] were given to the participants.

Inclusion criteria

1. Medical students who are studying for MBBS degree.

2. Medical students providing informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

1. Students having first- or second-degree relatives with a current psychiatric disorder.

2. Students undergoing treatment for mental health problems.

Tools of assessment

Semi-structured proforma

It contained sociodemographic details like name, age, gender, year of education, residential background, family and personal history of psychiatric illnesses and treatment.

Attitude Towards Psychiatry (ATP-30) questionnaire

The Attitude Towards Psychiatry‑30 items (ATP-30) is a five-point Likert scale designed and developed by Burra et al.[5] The scale consists of 30 positively and negatively phrased items which have been validated for assessing the attitude of different population towards psychiatry measuring the respondents’ attitude to psychiatric patients, psychiatric illness, psychiatrists, psychiatry career choice, psychiatric treatment, psychiatric institutions, and psychiatry teaching. It takes around ten minutes for each student. Each student can give his or her opinion as one - agree strongly; two - agree; three - no opinion/neutral; four - disagree, and five - disagree strongly. A score of one denotes a highly positive attitude, five denote a highly negative attitude, and three denote a neutral response. The score of each positively phrased item was converted by subtracting it from six. The total global scores range from 30 to 150. A global score of <90 (scores of one and two combined) suggests a negative attitude to psychiatry, a score of >90 (scores of four and five combined) denotes an overall positive attitude, and while a global score of 90 (average score of three) is considered to represent a neutral attitude.

Statistical analysis

Data was collected and tabulated using Microsoft excel. For qualitative data, mean and standard deviation (SD) were calculated. For quantitative data, frequency and percentages were calculated. An unpaired t-test was used for continuous variables. A chi-square/Fisher’s exact test has been used to find the significance of study parameters on a categorical scale between two or more variables. A p value is significant statistically if it is ≤0.05. The analysis was done using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 11.


The total number of consenting participants was 524; out of which, 40 were excluded from analysis due to the following reasons: 37 of them were incomplete responses, one had family history of mental illness (depression) and had taken treatment for depression, and two were on treatment for anxiety and depression. Out of 484, 253 (52.27%) were undergraduate students who had not attended psychiatry clinical postings and 231 (47.73%) had attended psychiatry clinical postings. All of them completed the questionnaire and submitted to the investigator. For purposes of the intergroup comparison of sociodemographic and attitudinal differences, the chi-square test and student’s t-test were utilised.

The mean age of the students attending and not attending psychiatry clinical postings was 19.03 (SD: 1.08) years and 21.14 (SD: 0.99) years respectively (p<0.001), minimum age 18 years and maximum 24. There was no statistically significant difference in other sociodemographic characteristics (Table 1). Undergraduate students who have attended psychiatry clinical postings showed a more positive attitude than students who have not attended psychiatry clinical postings (96.1% vs. 86.9%) (p<0.001) (Tables 2) and as mentioned in Table 3.


The attitude towards psychiatry is very important because undergraduate students are going to be involved in the care of patients with psychiatric illnesses either directly or indirectly in their future careers. Overall undergraduate medical students show positive attitude towards psychiatry using ATP-30 scale, but when compared with students with or without two weeks of clinical psychiatry posting exposure, majority of the students (96.1%) who have attended psychiatry clinical posting as a part of medical curriculum show more positive attitude than (86.9%) students who have not attended psychiatry clinical postings that is statistically significant. Only three percent of students show a negative attitude towards psychiatry even after exposure to psychiatry clinical posting compared to 12.3% of students who have not attended psychiatry clinical posting. These study findings are similar to studies which show improvement in attitude after clinical exposure to patients with psychiatric problem.[5-7] A few studies show the psychiatry course could not improve the attitude of the medical students. Poor awareness, lack of proper exposure and training in psychiatry may be postulated as probable reasons.[8-13]

Medical undergraduate students at Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences have shown a lot of interest in psychiatry by participating in national and state-level psychiatry quiz activities regularly over a decade and also by attending clinical postings regularly.[14] It is likely that the interest aroused in psychiatry may be the reason that the present study shows a more positive attitude towards psychiatry among undergraduate medical students. Although the ATP-30 scores recorded were comparable to previous studies conducted elsewhere, direct comparisons were difficult due to differences in the methodologies of the studies and the level of training of the participants. It has been demonstrated that favourable attitude gained soon after exposure to an internship in psychiatry decline with time.[9,15,16] Therefore, the increase in the ATP-30 scores needs to be interpreted with caution.

Psychiatric illness

The majority of students (80.1%) who have attended psychiatry clinical posting agree that it is interesting to try to unravel the cause of a psychiatric illness that is statistically significant compared to students (66.7%) who have not attended clinical postings. A study in India by Tharyan et al.[10] and Parikh et al.,[17] also had similar findings. As aetiology of most psychiatric illness is hypothetical, students are keen to know what could be possible causes leading to psychiatric illness.

Psychiatric institutions and treatments

Majority of students who have attended psychiatry clinical posting agree that psychiatric hospitals have a specific contribution to make for the treatment of the mentally ill, also disagree that psychiatric hospitals are little more than prisons and the practice of psychotherapy basically is fraudulent since there is no strong evidence that it is effective. It is statistically significant compared to students who have not attended clinical postings. Though it is not a statistically significant difference between the two groups, majority of them agree that psychiatric treatment causes patients to worry too much about their symptoms.

Similar findings were seen in studies by Corrigan et al.[18,19] that educating the young doctors will improve awareness about the management of mental illness. There were a few studies in European countries[20,21] and India[22,23] that show a lack of belief in the efficacy of psychiatric treatment. May be two weeks of clinical posting was not enough to know about the outcome of treatment of mental illness, and clinical posting focuses more on basic common illness and treatment, more exposure to psychiatry might require them to get to know better about the course and prognosis of mental illness.

Psychiatry knowledge and teaching

Majority of students who have attended psychiatry clinical posting for two weeks agree that psychiatry is a respected branch of medicine, also disagree that psychiatry is so unscientific that even psychiatrists cannot agree as to what its basic applied sciences are, and agree that these days psychiatry is the most important part of the curriculum in medical schools that is statistically significant compared to students who have not attended clinical postings. Also, in the previous study done by Konwar et al.[24]and Mutalik et al.[25] from India, undergraduate medical students were found to have multiple lacunae in their knowledge towards psychiatry, psychiatric disorders, psychiatric patients, and psychiatric treatment which however was found to be less in the students who had undergone two weeks’ clinical training. As the method of teaching undergraduate medical students from the current year is phase-wise competence-based teaching, it probably removes biases about the type of teaching done by different other subjects.

Psychiatrist and psychiatry as a career

Majority of the students who have attended psychiatry clinical posting disagree that psychiatrists seem to talk about nothing but sex and it is hard to think of psychiatrists as equal to other doctors, 32.9% disagree to become psychiatrist, 54.2% disagree that psychiatry is unlikeable because it makes so less use of medical training. 52.8% students disagree that on the whole, people taking up psychiatric training are running away from participation in real medicine and 38.1% agree that “If I were asked what I considered to be the three most exciting medical specialties, psychiatry would be excluded” that is statistically significant compared to 40.9% students who have not attended clinical postings. Results were similar to a study conducted by Aruna et al.,[26] but many studies show a psychiatrist in negative response.[27-30] Positive attitude towards psychiatrist indicates a changing trend among students about psychiatrist.

Several previous studies have shown a dissonance between favourable attitude and the intention to choose psychiatry as a future career,[31-33] whereas the study showed a nearly three-fold increase in the likelihood of pursuing a career in psychiatry from 9.4% to 25.8%. Similar improvements have been recorded following eight-week clinical attachments in both developed and developing countries.[34-36]

The negative attitude was not the only reason for refraining from choosing this field for one’s future career. Other reasons such as more of subjective history taking and less objective examinations, psychiatry subject being not as per their expectations, low employment opportunities for graduates in this field, low income, and stigma attached to psychiatry also may have role in students not opting for psychiatry as career.


There is a need to conduct multi-centric studies involving larger samples to arrive at the generalisability of this finding.


The current study shows an overall positive attitude towards psychiatry amongst undergraduate medical students. Clinical exposure in psychiatry improves their positive attitude and also shows that the choice of career depends on multiple factors not only on a positive attitude towards psychiatry.


We thank all the participating students and also extend our gratitude to the principal for permitting to conduct this study.


SKBK had a role in conceptualising, acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of the data along with drafting of the work and revising it critically. NRB helped in acquisition and analysis. VHR contributed for acquisition and interpretation of the data apart from providing intellectual content and revising the draft. All the authors had role in final approval of the version and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work.


  1. Rusch N, Angermeyer M, Corrigan P. Mental illness stigma: concepts, consequences, and initiatives to reduce stigma. Eur Psychiat. 2005;20:529-39.
  2. Cutler J, Harding K, Mozian S, Mozian S, Wright L, Pica A, et al. Discrediting the notion “working with crazies will make you crazy”: addressing stigma and enhancing empathy in medical student education. Adv in Health Sci Educ. 2009;14:487-502.
  3. Feifel D, Yu Moutier C, Swerdlow N. Attitudes toward psychiatry as a prospective career among students entering medical school. Am J Psychiatry. 1999;156:1397-402.
  4. Lyons Z. Impact of the psychiatry clerkship on medical student attitudes towards psychiatry, and to psychiatry as a career: a systematic review. Acad Psychiatry. 2014;38:35-42.
  5. Burra P, Kalin R, Leichner P, Waldron JJ, Handforth JR, Jarrett FJ, et al. The ATP 30-a scale for measuring medical students’ attitudes to psychiatry. Med Educ. 1982;16:31-8.
  6. Chung MC, Prasher VP. Differences in attitudes among medical students towards psychiatry in one English university. Psychol Rep. 1995;77:843-7.
  7. Sloan D, Browne S, Meagher D, Lane A, Larkin C, Casey P, et al. Attitudes toward psychiatry among Irish final year medical students. Eur Psychiatry. 1996;11:407-11.
  8. Hofmann M, Harendza S, Meyer J, Drabik A, Reimer J, Kuhnigk O. Effect of medical education on students’ attitudes toward psychiatry and individuals with mental disorders. Acad Psychiatry. 2013;37:380-4.
  9. Baxter H, Singh SP, Standen P, Duggan C. The attitudes of ‘tomorrow’s doctors’ towards mental illness and psychiatry: changes during the final undergraduate year. Med Educ. 2001;35:381-3.
  10. Tharyan P, John T, Tharyan A, Braganza D. Attitudes of ‘tomorrow’s doctors’ towards psychiatry and mental illness. Natl Med J India. 2001;14:355-9.
  11. Chawla JM, Balhara YP, Sagar R, Shivaprakash. Undergraduate medical students’ attitude toward psychiatry: a cross-sectional study. Indian J Psychiatry. 2012;54:37-40.
  12. Yadav T, Arya K, Kataria D, Balhara YP. Impact of psychiatric education and training on attitude of medical students towards mentally ill: a comparative analysis. Ind Psychiatry J. 2012;21:22-31.
  13. Gulati P, Das S, Chavan BS. Impact of psychiatry training on the attitude of medical students towards mental illness and psychiatry. Indian J Psychiatry. 2014;56:271-7.
  14. Kishor M, Vinay HR. Innovative ways and customizing psychiatry training for undergraduates. Indian J Psychiatry. 2015;57:431-3.
  15. Sivakumar K, Wilkinson G, Toone BK, Greer S. Attitudes to psychiatry in doctors at the end of their first post-graduate year: two-year follow-up of a cohort of medical students. Psychol Med. 1986;16:457-60.
  16. Maidment R, Livingston G, Katona M, Whitaker E, Katona C. Carry on shrinking: career intentions and attitudes to psychiatry of prospective medical students. Psychiatr Bull. 2003;27:30-2.
  17. Parikh NC, Sharma PS, Chaudhary PJ, Gandhi HA, Banwari GH. Study of the attitude of interns toward psychiatry: a survey of a tertiary level hospital in Ahmedabad. Ind Psychiatry J. 2014;23:143-8.
  18. Corrigan PW, Green A, Lundin R, Kubiak MA, Penn DL. Familiarity with and social distance from people who have a serious mental illness. Psychiatr Serv. 2001;52:953-8.
  19. Corrigan PW, River LP, Lundin RK, Penn DL, Uphoff-Wasowski K, Campion J, et al. Three strategies for changing attributions about severe mental illness. Schizophr Bull. 2001;27:187-95.
  20. Crisp AH, Gelder MG, Rix S, Meltzer HI, Rowlands OJ. Stigmatisation of people with mental illnesses. Br J Psychiatry. 2000;177:4-7.
  21. Roth D, Antony MM, Kerr KL, Downie F. Attitudes toward mental illness in medical students: does personal and professional experience with mental illness make a difference? Med Educ. 2000;34:234-6.
  22. Jiloha RC. Image of psychiatry among medical community. Indian J Psychiatry. 1989;31:285-7.
  23. Kumar A, Goyal U, Ganesh KS, Srivastava MK, Gautam BD, Kumar R. Attitude of postgraduate residents towards psychiatry. Indian J Psychiatry. 2001;43:2.
  24. Konwar R, Pardal PK, Prakash J, Rythem. Does psychiatry rotation in undergraduate curriculum bring about a change in the attitude of the medical student toward the concept and practice of psychiatry: a comparative analysis. Ind Psychiatry J. 2012;21:144-7.
  25. Mutalik NR, TP Tejaswi, Kashinakunti M, Choudhari SB. Attitude of medical undergraduate and postgraduate students towards psychiatry: a cross-sectional study. Open J Psychiatry Allied Sci. 2017;9:3-9.
  26. Aruna G, Mittal S, Yadiyal MB, Acharya C, Acharya S, Uppulari C. Perception, knowledge, and attitude toward mental disorders and psychiatry among medical undergraduates in Karnataka: a cross-sectional study. Indian J Psychiatry. 2016;58:70-6.
  27. Al-Ansari A, Alsadadi A. Attitude of Arabian Gulf university medical students towards psychiatry. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2002;15:180-8.
  28. Trivedi JK, Dhyani M. Undergraduate psychiatric education in South Asian countries. Indian J Psychiatry. 2007;49:163-5.
  29. Rao TS, Rao KN, Rudrappa DA, Reddy DR. Medical students’ attitudes to psychiatry: interest to specialize in psychiatry. Indian J Psychol Med. 1989;12:23-8.
  30. Lingeswaran A. Psychiatric curriculum and its impact on the attitude of Indian undergraduate medical students and interns. Indian J Psychol Med. 2010;32:119-27.
  31. Pidd S. Recruiting and retaining psychiatrists. Adv Psychiatr Treat. 2003;9:405-11.
  32. Shah P, Brown T, Eagles J. Choosing psychiatry: factors influencing career choice among foundation doctors in Scotland. In: Brown T, Eagles J, editors. Teaching psychiatry to undergraduates. London: RCPsych Publications; 2011:255-63.
  33. Brown TM, Addie K, Eagles JM. Recruitment into psychiatry: views of consultants in Scotland. Psychiatr Bull. 2007;31:411-3.
  34. Reddy JP, Tan SM, Azmi MT, Shaharom MH, Rosdinom R, Maniam T, et al. The effect of a clinical posting in psychiatry on the attitudes of medical students towards psychiatry and mental illness in a Malaysian medical school. Ann Acad Med Singap. 2005;34:505-10.
  35. Bulbena A, Pailhez G, Coll J, Balon R. Changes in the attitudes towards psychiatry among Spanish medical students during training in psychiatry. Eur J Psychiatry. 2005;19:79-87.
  36. Ndetei DM, Khasakhala L, Ongecha-Owuor F, Kuria M, Mutiso V, Syanda J, et al. Attitudes toward psychiatry: a survey of medical students at the University of Nairobi, Kenya. Acad Psychiatry. 2008;32:154-9.

BK SK, B NR, HR V. A cross-sectional study of attitude towards psychiatry among undergraduate medical students. Open J Psychiatry Allied Sci. 2021;12:48-54. doi: 10.5958/2394-2061.2021.00015.X. Epub 2020 Sep 26.

Source of support: Nil. Declaration of interest: None.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Nach oben